Pregnant With Hope
Oct. 16th, 2025 07:47 amThere is a quote that goes "Life is a disease: sexually transmitted and invariably fatal."
I don't know why but I feel like I need to re-examine my feelings and beliefs surrounding antinatalism. Maybe it has to do with me watching "Alien", then "Children of Men" then right after a documentary on YouTube about antinatalism because I was craving a moral/tonal whiplash.
"Children of Men" deserves a separate analysis in its own right. It's a film about protecting, saving and delivering a truly miraculous infant life in the most hopeless, bleak, brutal, corrupt, chaotic situations imaginable. Murder, abuse, pollution, apathy, extremism, zealotry, poverty, fascism are contrasted with courage, self-sacrifice, hope, goodness, connection, humour, simplicity, tenderness in the most powerful way possible. It's an astonishing piece of cinema. I've seen it before but that was over ten years ago. Now the world, or at least UK, seems closer to the 2027 depicted in the film in reality than current films depicting present day. It has a fascinating documentary style of filming that adds to the realism - the fact that the presence of the cameraman is obvious doesn't detract from the film at all because it makes you feel like you're there... But I'm not here to talk about the film.
It did seem like definitely a natalist propaganda but with strongly political and environmental messages woven throughout. And while I have loosely aligned myself with antinatalism as a moral standpoint, I was never totally convinced, it made sense to me but this is the kind of person I am. I like to question and revisit things I believe in and subscribe to. Because I'm always learning, changing, considering different perspectives, absorbing different information from new sources.
So I have been reconsidering my stance on antinatalism as a philosophy, but not as a personal choice. Which I suppose was inevitable given my readjustment on animal products a few months ago. That it's impossible to reduce the inherent suffering and cruelty of animals at the hands of humanity. And that not consuming animal products is a personal choice, because I don't really need or want them anyway, but I'm not depriving myself either.
But one thread between antinatalism and domesticated animals, especially farm/factory animals, converges. People creating life for their own purposes, without consideration for what is good and right to the life they are creating. Humans commodifying life, whether it's having kids because you already have a home and a car, or breeding pigs because you want bacon for breakfast. Life is as valuable as any short-term satisfaction. Even as a child, I was horrified at how hellish it seemed, like only Satan could invent a system of breeding animals just to kill them like an endless ritual sacrifice. As I grew older, I sometimes wondered whether humans breed humans for similarly immoral reasons, or whether there was something more sinister at play, like an evil god spawning life just to watch it suffer from all manner of natural and man-made horrors.
But... I realise that is a perspective. An opinion is not a fact, even if it feels true. But that's just it. It's feelings-based. Philosophy is not science. Not like psychology or sociology or anthropology. Philosophy like religion can be chosen when it affirms personal perspectives, ideals, thoughts. But that's not the right way to read philosophy, in my opinion. Philosophy requires constant justification, revaluation, criticism etc. it must not exist in a vacuum. So in a roundabout way I am saying I am open to change my views. Right now it's about antinatalism.
The truth is, I don't actually wish I wasn't born, nor do I really resent my parents. Sure, when things are hard I think about how fucking selfish and stupid they were. And I think about how I should end it all because of how woefully unequipped I am to live. But those are moments that pass. Just like everything does. Suffering is not a constant. It's everywhere but so is pleasure, beauty, love. It takes effort to see those things. It takes openness and vulnerability and courage to experience them. Likewise, a happy and generally stable person is going to perceive pessimism as extreme, sensitivity to socially accepted cruelty as a fragility or overreaction.
Because of this, I truly cannot say that the reason I'm an antinatalist is because I don't want my children to suffer. Joy and beauty in life is guaranteed too. Even if it's short, but sometimes those short moments stay with us forever. The opposite of trauma.
Life is worth something. If it wasn't, evolution wouldn't have tried so hard to ensure sex is as pleasurable for us as possible. Pleasure and love are the keys to survival. It doesn't need to be a "trick of nature" which I think Shopenhauer wrote. Even the animals in the wild, who are in near constant survival mode, can relax and play and have friends and goofy moments. Life is too vibrant and complex for its meaning to be reduced only to suffering and nihilism. But it's sometimes difficult not to see it that way, especially as humans.
This is all to say that I do not believe that bringing a child into this world is morally wrong. At least not in that philosophical sense which places a negative value on life. Yet antinatalists don't really promote suicide, even if some if them are misanthropic enough to preach the benefits of total human extinction. Another prevailing argument antinatalists have is the absence of consent in their own birth. As if existence is the most fundamental violation of their rights, akin to rape, even if asking an unborn baby if they want to be born is literally impossible. Even if babies could consent, how could they possibly make an informed decision? Based on what? The fact that your parents chose to have you instead of aborting you or simply refusing to have sex. I guess I see the issue if you're dealing with parents who mistreated you, neglected you, or because their desire to have you is not meaningful enough for you. Choice is such a slippery thing sometimes when it comes to these big, broad questions. A Zen master might say that you did not choose to be born but you choose to suffer. Does the wind choose to sway the trees? You aren't here to suffer. You're here to be here... Or something.
If choosing to create life nonconsensual with respect to that life, then so is choosing to abort that life. This is why pro-life and pro-choice movements will never see eye to eye. Is it your choice or are you making it for someone else? Why is an umborn life more valuable than the one that already exists?
Which neatly brings me to my next point.
My real reason I don't want kids is the absolute horror, disgust, revulsion and mortal fear I feel at the idea of childbirth. Nothing in existence brings out a more visceral phobia in my mind than me going through pregnancy and labour, or even having to witness it. Even when I'm near a pregnant woman I feel an animalistic sense of danger kick in, I immediately associate pregnancy with danger. Unborn life with imminent death. A body being consumed from within by a parasitic entity. I wonder why we don't just lay eggs like why are mammals a thing? What was the point in evolving from laying eggs to growing a creature in your body for months at a time while it eats what you eat.
Which is a funny thing for me to say after watching Alien. Eggs are really superior to wombs, not to mention is ensures gender equality. Or some animals can lay the eggs, bury them, and then just move on with their life.
There's also the fact that I hate my genes. I don't want to pass them on. I'd feel guilty. We don't know enough about genes anyway - the human genome project raised more questions than it answered.
Though I do admit that if there was a man I loved so much I literally wanted his babies, I would focus more on his genes passing on more than mine. I mean genetic predisposions are basically a random dice roll. Sometimes you're more like one parent and less like the other. Sometimes you skip over both and have more traits from your grandparents and so on.
I have absolutely zero confidence in myself as a potential parent. Even if there's tons of literally, content, classes, entire communities and people offering guidance on parenting.
I suppose the final big reason has a more... revolutionary angle.
To refuse to have children is fundamentally anticapitalist. Anti-nationalist. It's more ecological too. Most parents can't protest or fight or participate in resistance movements. Not only because they have to work to provide for their children, but they also put those children at risk if they're a public figure.
I may not be a protester or a revolutionary (yet? Who knows), but the fact that antinatalism could force our current economic, political and social dynamic to grind its gears to a halt is undeniable. I like the idea of antinatalism as a politically informed decision. It feels solid. Like refusing to sacrifice your baby to a meatgrinder. By infusing antinatalism with politics I feel like I'm fighting FOR something, not against something. I'm saying that I refuse to bring a child into this world and until it gets better, everyone should refuse. This shit sucks and it feels like we're overdue a societal collapse anyway. It sounds crazy, like how could you convince people to abstain from parenthood for possibly decades, but this is one way to fight for the future. No babies, no wage slaves. The only way to actually put children first is to refuse to have them until something in the world changes for the better. This feels like never, but who knows.
The answer is not to say "life sucks this world is a shithole so why would you spawn an innocent baby into it" but to make the world better somehow, maybe even a little is enough, so that even a shithole world has enough hope for the next generation to keep the flame going.
I should also state something kind of obvious and that I am definitely open to considering and very much admire.
Adoption. Loving and caring after unwanted children, giving them a better life. That I could happily get behind.
And if I really really inexplicably wanted my own biological child I'd have to get rich enough to afford a surrogate. Or go through some prolonged treatment specialising in extreme body horror childbirth phobias because holy shit. I would genuinely legitimately rather get shot than go through a full pregnancy and childbirth. It's not worth it. Everything about pregnancy and childbirth and postnatal stuff fills me with disgust and dread and panic. Unless it's an actual horror film. What horrifies me is all the medical and biological stuff. All the endless complications that often arise. How traumatising it is. The idea of giving birth in the same soulless sterile building where people suffer and die, surrounded by uniformed people you don't know (nurses, doctors, patients) is completely insane to me. I would never give birth in a hospital. I'll take the midwives but god. I'd feel more comfortable giving birth in a shitty dirty apartment in a refugee town, like the miracle baby "Children of Men" honestly. And I have nothing against hospitals. I'm not afraid of all that. It just feels too cold, mechanical, soulless and unnatural as a baby's first introduction to the world. Idk. It feels deeply wrong to me personally so I wouldn't do it, but I think there's birthing lodges or something. Comforting accommodation specifically designed for people who don't want to give birth in the hospital or at home. Maybe I'm making shit up, who cares.
There's an old Roman saying that goes "where there is life, there is hope" and I guess this is literally what children represent. Hope, especially for a better future, and maybe that's why people have kids. But I feel like we're fucking up so badly as a society and as a civilization that even the youngest generations can already seem hopeless. But I don't actually believe that. Children are pliable and easily programmable. Only the most extreme damage is beyond saving, and even then it's inexplicably dependent on individuals who can and do defy impossible odds. Like the daughter of Josef Fritzl, who didn't turn into a suicidal or murderous soulless maniac despite what she went through.
Hope is simultaneously the most fragile and tenacious thing, isn't it?
I don't know why but I feel like I need to re-examine my feelings and beliefs surrounding antinatalism. Maybe it has to do with me watching "Alien", then "Children of Men" then right after a documentary on YouTube about antinatalism because I was craving a moral/tonal whiplash.
"Children of Men" deserves a separate analysis in its own right. It's a film about protecting, saving and delivering a truly miraculous infant life in the most hopeless, bleak, brutal, corrupt, chaotic situations imaginable. Murder, abuse, pollution, apathy, extremism, zealotry, poverty, fascism are contrasted with courage, self-sacrifice, hope, goodness, connection, humour, simplicity, tenderness in the most powerful way possible. It's an astonishing piece of cinema. I've seen it before but that was over ten years ago. Now the world, or at least UK, seems closer to the 2027 depicted in the film in reality than current films depicting present day. It has a fascinating documentary style of filming that adds to the realism - the fact that the presence of the cameraman is obvious doesn't detract from the film at all because it makes you feel like you're there... But I'm not here to talk about the film.
It did seem like definitely a natalist propaganda but with strongly political and environmental messages woven throughout. And while I have loosely aligned myself with antinatalism as a moral standpoint, I was never totally convinced, it made sense to me but this is the kind of person I am. I like to question and revisit things I believe in and subscribe to. Because I'm always learning, changing, considering different perspectives, absorbing different information from new sources.
So I have been reconsidering my stance on antinatalism as a philosophy, but not as a personal choice. Which I suppose was inevitable given my readjustment on animal products a few months ago. That it's impossible to reduce the inherent suffering and cruelty of animals at the hands of humanity. And that not consuming animal products is a personal choice, because I don't really need or want them anyway, but I'm not depriving myself either.
But one thread between antinatalism and domesticated animals, especially farm/factory animals, converges. People creating life for their own purposes, without consideration for what is good and right to the life they are creating. Humans commodifying life, whether it's having kids because you already have a home and a car, or breeding pigs because you want bacon for breakfast. Life is as valuable as any short-term satisfaction. Even as a child, I was horrified at how hellish it seemed, like only Satan could invent a system of breeding animals just to kill them like an endless ritual sacrifice. As I grew older, I sometimes wondered whether humans breed humans for similarly immoral reasons, or whether there was something more sinister at play, like an evil god spawning life just to watch it suffer from all manner of natural and man-made horrors.
But... I realise that is a perspective. An opinion is not a fact, even if it feels true. But that's just it. It's feelings-based. Philosophy is not science. Not like psychology or sociology or anthropology. Philosophy like religion can be chosen when it affirms personal perspectives, ideals, thoughts. But that's not the right way to read philosophy, in my opinion. Philosophy requires constant justification, revaluation, criticism etc. it must not exist in a vacuum. So in a roundabout way I am saying I am open to change my views. Right now it's about antinatalism.
The truth is, I don't actually wish I wasn't born, nor do I really resent my parents. Sure, when things are hard I think about how fucking selfish and stupid they were. And I think about how I should end it all because of how woefully unequipped I am to live. But those are moments that pass. Just like everything does. Suffering is not a constant. It's everywhere but so is pleasure, beauty, love. It takes effort to see those things. It takes openness and vulnerability and courage to experience them. Likewise, a happy and generally stable person is going to perceive pessimism as extreme, sensitivity to socially accepted cruelty as a fragility or overreaction.
Because of this, I truly cannot say that the reason I'm an antinatalist is because I don't want my children to suffer. Joy and beauty in life is guaranteed too. Even if it's short, but sometimes those short moments stay with us forever. The opposite of trauma.
Life is worth something. If it wasn't, evolution wouldn't have tried so hard to ensure sex is as pleasurable for us as possible. Pleasure and love are the keys to survival. It doesn't need to be a "trick of nature" which I think Shopenhauer wrote. Even the animals in the wild, who are in near constant survival mode, can relax and play and have friends and goofy moments. Life is too vibrant and complex for its meaning to be reduced only to suffering and nihilism. But it's sometimes difficult not to see it that way, especially as humans.
This is all to say that I do not believe that bringing a child into this world is morally wrong. At least not in that philosophical sense which places a negative value on life. Yet antinatalists don't really promote suicide, even if some if them are misanthropic enough to preach the benefits of total human extinction. Another prevailing argument antinatalists have is the absence of consent in their own birth. As if existence is the most fundamental violation of their rights, akin to rape, even if asking an unborn baby if they want to be born is literally impossible. Even if babies could consent, how could they possibly make an informed decision? Based on what? The fact that your parents chose to have you instead of aborting you or simply refusing to have sex. I guess I see the issue if you're dealing with parents who mistreated you, neglected you, or because their desire to have you is not meaningful enough for you. Choice is such a slippery thing sometimes when it comes to these big, broad questions. A Zen master might say that you did not choose to be born but you choose to suffer. Does the wind choose to sway the trees? You aren't here to suffer. You're here to be here... Or something.
If choosing to create life nonconsensual with respect to that life, then so is choosing to abort that life. This is why pro-life and pro-choice movements will never see eye to eye. Is it your choice or are you making it for someone else? Why is an umborn life more valuable than the one that already exists?
Which neatly brings me to my next point.
My real reason I don't want kids is the absolute horror, disgust, revulsion and mortal fear I feel at the idea of childbirth. Nothing in existence brings out a more visceral phobia in my mind than me going through pregnancy and labour, or even having to witness it. Even when I'm near a pregnant woman I feel an animalistic sense of danger kick in, I immediately associate pregnancy with danger. Unborn life with imminent death. A body being consumed from within by a parasitic entity. I wonder why we don't just lay eggs like why are mammals a thing? What was the point in evolving from laying eggs to growing a creature in your body for months at a time while it eats what you eat.
Which is a funny thing for me to say after watching Alien. Eggs are really superior to wombs, not to mention is ensures gender equality. Or some animals can lay the eggs, bury them, and then just move on with their life.
There's also the fact that I hate my genes. I don't want to pass them on. I'd feel guilty. We don't know enough about genes anyway - the human genome project raised more questions than it answered.
Though I do admit that if there was a man I loved so much I literally wanted his babies, I would focus more on his genes passing on more than mine. I mean genetic predisposions are basically a random dice roll. Sometimes you're more like one parent and less like the other. Sometimes you skip over both and have more traits from your grandparents and so on.
I have absolutely zero confidence in myself as a potential parent. Even if there's tons of literally, content, classes, entire communities and people offering guidance on parenting.
I suppose the final big reason has a more... revolutionary angle.
To refuse to have children is fundamentally anticapitalist. Anti-nationalist. It's more ecological too. Most parents can't protest or fight or participate in resistance movements. Not only because they have to work to provide for their children, but they also put those children at risk if they're a public figure.
I may not be a protester or a revolutionary (yet? Who knows), but the fact that antinatalism could force our current economic, political and social dynamic to grind its gears to a halt is undeniable. I like the idea of antinatalism as a politically informed decision. It feels solid. Like refusing to sacrifice your baby to a meatgrinder. By infusing antinatalism with politics I feel like I'm fighting FOR something, not against something. I'm saying that I refuse to bring a child into this world and until it gets better, everyone should refuse. This shit sucks and it feels like we're overdue a societal collapse anyway. It sounds crazy, like how could you convince people to abstain from parenthood for possibly decades, but this is one way to fight for the future. No babies, no wage slaves. The only way to actually put children first is to refuse to have them until something in the world changes for the better. This feels like never, but who knows.
The answer is not to say "life sucks this world is a shithole so why would you spawn an innocent baby into it" but to make the world better somehow, maybe even a little is enough, so that even a shithole world has enough hope for the next generation to keep the flame going.
I should also state something kind of obvious and that I am definitely open to considering and very much admire.
Adoption. Loving and caring after unwanted children, giving them a better life. That I could happily get behind.
And if I really really inexplicably wanted my own biological child I'd have to get rich enough to afford a surrogate. Or go through some prolonged treatment specialising in extreme body horror childbirth phobias because holy shit. I would genuinely legitimately rather get shot than go through a full pregnancy and childbirth. It's not worth it. Everything about pregnancy and childbirth and postnatal stuff fills me with disgust and dread and panic. Unless it's an actual horror film. What horrifies me is all the medical and biological stuff. All the endless complications that often arise. How traumatising it is. The idea of giving birth in the same soulless sterile building where people suffer and die, surrounded by uniformed people you don't know (nurses, doctors, patients) is completely insane to me. I would never give birth in a hospital. I'll take the midwives but god. I'd feel more comfortable giving birth in a shitty dirty apartment in a refugee town, like the miracle baby "Children of Men" honestly. And I have nothing against hospitals. I'm not afraid of all that. It just feels too cold, mechanical, soulless and unnatural as a baby's first introduction to the world. Idk. It feels deeply wrong to me personally so I wouldn't do it, but I think there's birthing lodges or something. Comforting accommodation specifically designed for people who don't want to give birth in the hospital or at home. Maybe I'm making shit up, who cares.
There's an old Roman saying that goes "where there is life, there is hope" and I guess this is literally what children represent. Hope, especially for a better future, and maybe that's why people have kids. But I feel like we're fucking up so badly as a society and as a civilization that even the youngest generations can already seem hopeless. But I don't actually believe that. Children are pliable and easily programmable. Only the most extreme damage is beyond saving, and even then it's inexplicably dependent on individuals who can and do defy impossible odds. Like the daughter of Josef Fritzl, who didn't turn into a suicidal or murderous soulless maniac despite what she went through.
Hope is simultaneously the most fragile and tenacious thing, isn't it?